Received: by mail2.netcom.com (8.6.8.1/Netcom) id WAA06867; Thu, 16 Jun 1994 22:51:48 -0700
Received: from nova.unix.portal.com by mail2.netcom.com (8.6.8.1/Netcom) id WAA06818; Thu, 16 Jun 1994 22:51:06 -0700
From: Jeric@cup.portal.com
Received: from hobo.corp.portal.com (hobo.corp.portal.com [156.151.1.14]) by nova.unix.portal.com (8.6.7/8.6.5) with ESMTP id WAA10858 for <lightwave-l@netcom.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 1994 22:51:16 -0700
Received: from localhost (pccop@localhost) by hobo.corp.portal.com (8.6.4/1.50) id WAA01231 for lightwave-l@netcom.com; Thu, 16 Jun 1994 22:51:14 -0700
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Subject: Re: Digitizing Video With Par
Lines: 30
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 94 22:51:14 PDT
Message-ID: <9406162251.1.27827@cup.portal.com>
X-Origin: The Portal System (TM)
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Fred Pienkos writes:
>
>We aree getting a par and a tbc4 soon where i work, and i was wondering
>if it actually records video at 60 fields per second using the tbcIV.
>Has anyone done this?
Yes I have, and yes it does.
>Does it work good? Hows the quality?
With the Micropolis drives, the capture quality is virtually
transparent. The Seagate is not recommended for capture--captures at about
VHS quality. Get the Micropolis.
Id be
>skeptical to think it worked good, or I would think i would have heard
>more about it.
Haven't been reading here, have you? Everybody loves it.